Cases 61 - 70 of 27,482
Franklin Wright v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN WRIGHT
Defendant:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2024cv04561
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Bennett et al v. Bannon et al
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ret. Sgt. Craig T. Bennett, Francine M. Bennett, Aliyah M. Bennett and others
Defendant:
Eric J. Bannon, Kirk William Ruquet, Matthew R. Sarkissian and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RIVERA v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv04425
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL J. RIVERA
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY NEW JERSEY, EUGENE CALDWELL, II, CUMBERLAND COUNTY INSURANCE COMM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIANG v. M & T RESTAURANT INC. et al
as 2:2024cv04443
Plaintiff:
JUN LIANG
Defendant:
M & T Restaurant Inc. and XIHONING TANG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RODRIGUEZ VARGAS v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv04449
Plaintiff:
RICARDO RODRIGUEZ VARGAS
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and T. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlene Henry, et al v. Uber, et al
as 24-1547
Plaintiff:
CARLENE HENRY and EVERSON FRANCIS
Defendant:
UBER, DOUGLAS GREGG, PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE and others
Jung v. Peisert et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Changyoung Jung
Defendant:
Daniel A. Peisert, Paul Schwichtenberg, Heather L. Mason and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
