Cases 71 - 80 of 669
AUTRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv01501
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY AUTRY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN PIERRE LACOMBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALLER v. SLEVINSKI et al
as 2:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
EMANUEL FRANCHEZ WALLER
Defendant:
DANETTE L. SLEVINSKI, BRIAN PINSON, KEYON NICHOLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NICHOLS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01822
Petitioner:
NYRON JOEL NICHOLS
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
NICHOLS v. MORRISEY et al
as 2:2023cv00637
Plaintiff:
RONDALE NICHOLS
Defendant:
NICHOLAS F MORRISEY, SIMPSON & BROWN INC and SALES LEASING COMPANY INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
QUINONES v. IRVIN et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE MONIQUE QUINONES and SHAWN SHANNON QUINONES
Defendant:
RONI IRVIN, TAMMY BASHOR, CAPTAIN HOWARD SISSEM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LIGHTNING METALS, LLC v. NOLIN MILLING, INC.
as 3:2023cv00024
Plaintiff:
LIGHTNING METALS, LLC doing business as NICHOLS STAINLESS
Defendant:
NOLIN MILLING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Ortiz v. SCI Dallas, et al
as 3:2023cv00214
In Re:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
M. Sopata, A. A. Smith, D. Mull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-3398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHESHER et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
SHANE CHESTER, JOANNE M. KING, ANDREW NOSBISCH and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
