Cases 71 - 80 of 2,797
WHITE v. SALTER
as 5:2023cv01735
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE, JR.
Defendant:
MIKE SALTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LINK et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2023cv02635
Plaintiff:
John Link, Jr., KEITH ACTON, DENNIS AHRENS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AGC CHEMICALS AMERICAS INC, AMEREX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
WHITE v. PRIME CARE CORP et al
as 5:2023cv01583
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE
Defendant:
PRIME CARE CORP, LILLIAN THOMAS, DR. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALEXANDER v. MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP et al
as 3:2023cv03173
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ALEXANDER, III
Defendant:
MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP, MICHAEL GARDNER, OFFICER GAVIN REILLY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. OLIVENCIA ENTERPRISE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01928
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
OLIVENCIA ENTERPRISE, LLC and CHARLES OLIVENCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AUGUST v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2023cv00918
Plaintiff:
WILLIE L. AUGUST, JR.
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Willie Harris v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 23-1551
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE MAURICE HARRIS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
IN RE: WILLIE A. BROWN
as 2:2023cv01749
Petitioner:
WILLIE A. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1415 Education: Procedural Safeguards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
