Cases 1 - 10 of 4,939
A-ONE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC. v. LIDO TRANSPORT INC. et al
as 3:2024cv06916
Plaintiff:
A-ONE COMMERCIAL INSURANCE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
LIDO TRANSPORT INC. and DILSHOD O. MUKHAMADIEV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
MEARS v. C/O SMITH et al
as 2:2024cv06864
Plaintiff:
KEITH E. MEARS
Defendant:
C/O SMITH and WARDEN ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRANCH v. DILLARD et al
as 2:2024cv00830
Plaintiff:
WERDELL BRANCH
Defendant:
C/O. DILLARD and C/O. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. KARASTON et al
as 2:2024cv01501
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY RICE
Defendant:
C/O KARASTON, C/O MANTUCE, C/O ANTWON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Dameia Smith
as 24-2020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DAMEIA O. SMITH, a/k/a Omar, a/k/a D
Schutts et al v. The University of the Arts
as 2:2024cv02420
Plaintiff:
Brad M. Schutts, Laura Grutzeck, Carolina Blatt and others
Defendant:
The University of the Arts
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification (WARN)
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Garg et al
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Vipin K. Garg, Richard I. Eisenstadt, M. Scott Harris and others
Pace O Matic Inc v. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott LLC, et al
as 24-1984
Plaintiff:
PACE O MATIC INC
Defendant:
ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT LLC, MARK S. STEWART and KEVIN M. SKJOLDAL
Appellant:
GREENWOOD GAMING AND ENTERTAINMENT INC, DBA Parx Casino
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
