Cases 1 - 10 of 17,671
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, Frank D. Yeary, David Zinsner and others
SMITH v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv07132
Plaintiff:
TERRY SMITH
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv07101
Plaintiff:
REBECCA A SMITH and WILLIAM M SMITH
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA), INC., LLT MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kareem Millhouse v. Heath, et al
as 24-2132
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant:
SUZANNE V. HEATH, JAMES FOSNOT, DAVID EBBERT and others
Marianne Sawicki v. Michael Kipphan, et al
as 24-2120
Plaintiff:
MARIANNE SAWICKI
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. KIPPHAN, LORI HEATON, RICHARD A. WILSON and others
COLEY v. WOZNIAK et al
as 2:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH J. COLEY
Defendant:
JOSHUA WOZNIAK, CORTY SMITH and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH v. STRUBINGER et al
as 2:2024cv01655
Plaintiff:
ALISHA SMITH and ALISHA SHEPARD-SMITH
Defendant:
SERGEANT GEOFFREY STRUBINGER, DETECTIVE THOMAS D'ALESIO, NORMA PELUYERA-ALAMO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SMITH v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
ALPHEAUS SMITH
Defendant:
SAMANTHA THOMPSON and NOAH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
