Cases 1 - 10 of 11
KNIGHT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv01455
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN J. ASCENCIO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kannady et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv13476
Plaintiff:
CHRISTY CARLSON, Darla Baswell, Timothy Bart and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
PTI Royston, LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
USA v. Ismael Ascencio
as 15-1721
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISMAEL ASCENCIO, agent of Julian Ascencio
Torres v. Ascencio et al
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Torres
Defendant:
David Amael Moran Ascencio and Smirna Salazar De Calles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walter Ascencio v. Attorney General United State
as 13-1305
Petitioner:
WALTER ALCIDES ASCENCIO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
STEPHEN v. S&S CREDIT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv05201
Plaintiff:
SALLY STEPHEN
Defendant:
S&S CREDIT COMPANY, INC. , STOP & SHOP SUPERMARKET COMPANY, LLC , STOP & SHOP COMPANIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Ralph McClain, Jr. v. RandyClark, et al
as 12-1443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK, JAMES ASCENCIO, BURTON, SCI FAYT and others
MCCLAIN v. CLARK et al
as 2:2011cv00164
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Defendant:
RANDY CLARK, JAMES ASCENCIO, BURTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
