Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Efrain Perez v. Warden Beckley FCI
as 23-2836
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EFRAIN PEREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN BECKLEY FCI
BECKLEY et al v. BOROUGH OF SELLERSVILLE et al
as 2:2023cv01109
Plaintiff:
WALTER DOUGLAS BECKLEY and MARILYN J BECKLEY
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF SELLERSVILLE and EILEEN BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamrick et al v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company et al
as 1:2023cv00238
Plaintiff:
Mary J. Hamrick, David B. Beckley and Valentin Rodriguez
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Administrative Committee of the DuPont Pension and Retirement Plan and Jane/John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ATUH v. BECKLEY
as 2:2022cv03565
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN ATUH
Defendant:
JAY BECKLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hammonds v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2020cv00447
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, David McDermott, CO McCafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Rasheda Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAUNDERS v. RALEIGH COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
CHARLES R. HUMPHREY, THEE HONORABLE ADAM DIMLICH, CITY OF BECKLEY and others
Plaintiff:
RAYCO SAUNDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammonds v. Luzerne County et al
as 3:2019cv02199
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, David McDermott, Joseph Katra and others
Plaintiff:
Rasheda Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Weston Smith v. John Friel, et al
as 19-2721
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY L. KELLEY, JIM HERTZEL, MERLE L. EBERT, District Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTON SMITH
Smith v. Friel et al
as 1:2019cv00943
Defendant:
John Friel, Michael Halkias, Elizabeth Beckley and others
Plaintiff:
Weston Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EMMETT v. DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND PROBATION et al
as 1:2019cv00573
Defendant:
Sgt. Beckley, Shannon, -, Robert Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Marie Emmett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
