Cases 1 - 10 of 45
FATA v. LANG et al
as 5:2026cv03661
Plaintiff:
ABRAHIM FATA
Defendant:
CHARLES LANG, MARTHA LANG, PAMELA PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
LOPEZ v. HARRY et al
as 2:2026cv03166
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, BRITNEY HUNER, DR ANTHONY LETIZIO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. TERRA et al
as 2:2026cv03123
Plaintiff:
RODNEY ALLEN
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CHARLES HENSLEY, MS. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEWTON v. CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2026cv03257
Plaintiff:
MARK NEWTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEW JERSEY, MAYOR RAS BARAKA, NEWARK POLICE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRIGHT v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2025cv06423
Plaintiff:
BRITNEY KAY BRIGHT
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SZOMOR v. A CANVAS PAINTING et al
as 2:2025cv01696
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM SZOMOR
Defendant:
A CANVAS PAINTING, A CRAFTS, A HAPPY DECORATION PAINTING and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Matthews v. Huner et al
as 2:2025cv03697
Plaintiff:
Guy Matthews
Defendant:
Britney Huner, CHCA-Medical, Letizio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troy Lewald v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 25-2166
Plaintiff:
TROY LEWALD
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE M. LITTLE, KERI MOORE and others
Mitchell et al v. Kmel et al
as 3:2025cv00362
Plaintiff:
Avemarie Mitchell and Britney Flynn
Defendant:
Kmel and Curt Peter Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL et al v. KMEL et al
as 5:2025cv00836
Plaintiff:
AVEMARIE MITCHELL and BRITNEY FLYNN
Defendant:
KMEL and CURT PETER MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
