Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Quiller v. Burgette Excavation, LLC
as 3:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Tyaire Quiller
Defendant:
Burgette Excavation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MILLER v. BURGETT et al
as 5:2019cv05309
Defendant:
OFFICER JAY HATFIELD, OFFICER RYAN BURGETT and OFFICER JOEL THOMAS
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EDWARD MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Margle v. O'Brien et al
as 3:2019cv00105
Defendant:
Dane S. O'Brien, James Eastman, Jr., Herbert Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Margle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGETT v. TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC.
as 5:2018cv02583
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY BURGETT
Defendant:
TRISTAR INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BURGETT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08473
Plaintiff:
ELKE BURGETT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEARDEN et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00713
Plaintiff:
DAVID DEARDEN , VIRGINIAANNE ROSNER , DIEGO FRANK BURNS and others
Defendant:
FCA US LLC , CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, NANETTE S. BRICKNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Omari Patton v. Robert Werlinger, et al
as 14-2029
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OMARI HOWARD PATTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WERLINGER and BRYCE BURGETT, individually and in their official capacities
PATTON v. WERLINGER et al
as 3:2012cv00247
Plaintiff:
OMARI H. PATTON
Defendant:
ROBERT WERLINGER and BRYCE BURGETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BURGETT v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67732
Plaintiff:
KATHRYN DEAMS BURGETT
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
