Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Roy v. Russell et al
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Anand Roy
Defendant:
Mark A. Russell, Michael Lohscheller, Stephen J. Girsky and others
THOMPSON v. NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 3:2023cv20468
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY ATTORNEY GENERAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, MONMOUT COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE (MCPO) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON v. CITY OF ASBURY PARK et al
as 3:2022cv06040
Plaintiff:
RANDY C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CITY OF ASBURY PARK, CHIEF DAVID KELSO, CAPTAIN JEFFERY WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
THOMPSON et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03350
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. THOMPSON, JR. and SUZANNE THOMPSON
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv09615
Plaintiff:
DAVID C THOMPSON
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv06481
Plaintiff:
NEAL C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THOMPSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06370
Plaintiff:
LYNNELL C. THOMPSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINKLE v. CRONIN et al
as 2:2015cv01623
Plaintiff:
LESLIE D. HINKLE
Defendant:
LISA A. CRONIN, MARY LYNN THOMPSON, WILLIAM K. THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
CRONIN et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2015cv01576
Plaintiff:
LISA A. CRONIN , MARY LYNN THOMPSON , WILLIAM K. THOMPSON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. THOMPSON and LESLIE D. HINKLE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ever Perez v. Richard Gamez, et al
as 14-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVER PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TROOPER RICHARD GAMEZ, OFFICER ANDREW RICHARD CRONE, BRIAN HUNTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
