Cases 1 - 10 of 1,253
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv06025
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COLETTE PETERS, RACHEL THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Sartoris v. Haidle, et al
as 24-1871
Plaintiff:
EDWARD SARTORIS
Defendant:
WARDEN HAIDLE, SGT. ZITO, Correctional Officer and DEPUTY WARDEN MCCOY
Alvin Washington v. Bregman, et al
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ALVIN WASHINGTON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BREGMAN and SGT. F. MCCLELLAN
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PARSONS v. COUNTY OF ESSEX et al
as 2:2024cv05615
Plaintiff:
DEVIN PARSONS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ESSEX, ESSEX COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECTION OFFICER MELISSA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STRADER v. SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2024cv05638
Plaintiff:
SHAWN R. STRADER
Defendant:
SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CORRECTIONS OFFICER LUCIANO and MENTAL HEALTH DOCTORS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMENAMIN v. SPIRO et al
as 1:2024cv05538
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCMENAMIN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SPIRO, SERGEANT SLOAN and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODWARD v. MATLOCK et al
as 1:2024cv05468
Plaintiff:
SHAWN A. WOODWARD
Defendant:
CAPTAIN MATLOCK, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BROWN and CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorrio v. Francis, et al
as 24-1711
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORRIO
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FRANCIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
