Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Palani Karupaiyan v. , et alIn re: Palani Karupaiyan v. , et al
as 23-2878
Petitioner:
In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff:
P. P., R. P. and SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Respondent:
JUDGE SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE L. NAGANANDA, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ, JUDGE NAGA LAW FIRM, individually and in her capacity as Judge of Appellate division of NJ and others
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. Lee Solomon, et al
as 23-1788
Defendant / Appellee:
In re: JUSTICE LEE A. SOLOMON, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ, SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTRAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, individually and in his official capacity as owner of Naga Law Firm and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, P. P. and R. P.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN
Debtor / Appellee:
OAK TREE VILLAGE and EDISON TOWNSHIP NEW JERSEY
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P P. and others
Defendant:
SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KARUPAIYAN et al v. SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS et al
as 2:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN, SANTHOSH SUBRAMANIYAN, P. P. and others
Defendant:
SHALIMAR GROUP OF RESTAURANTS, L. NAGANANDA, NAGA LAW FIRM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant:
JUDGE BARRY T. ALBIN, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE CRAIG CORSON, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 21-2560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTICE STUART RABNER, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ
Defendant:
ALLISON E. ACCURSO, BARRY T. ALBIN, CRAIG CORSON and others
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 21-1813
Defendant / Appellee:
ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, JUSTICE WALTER F. TIMPONE, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of Supreme Court of N, JUDGE JERALD COUNCIL, individually and in his official capacity as Judges of the Superior Court, Middlesex County, NJ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant:
JUDGE ALLISON E. ACCURSO, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE JOSEPH L. YANNOTTI, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
