Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kent v. CTI BioPharma Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00617
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
CTI BioPharma Corp., Adam R. Craig, Laurent Fischer and others
FULLER v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2022cv00119
Plaintiff:
RONALD FULLER
Defendant:
D. OBERLANDER, D. PERRY, SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
COPELAND v. D. PERRY et al
as 1:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
DAVID COPELAND
Defendant:
D. PERRY and D. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBONS v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BARRY GIBBONS
Defendant:
BICKELL, RICH KUSTENBAUDER, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
PERRY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv12559
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
ANGELA D. PERRY
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PALMER v. WATTERSON et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
D. PERRY, C.O. WATTERSON, C.O. KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
ALONZO PALMER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Perry v. Saul
as 1:2019cv01923
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jacinda D. Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PERRY et al v. AIG et al
as 1:2018cv15455
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE PERRY and JAMES D. PERRY, IV
Defendant:
AIG and NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURG, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
Jacinda D. Perry
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Banks v. Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit et al
as 1:2014cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Director, Office of Science and Technology Behavioral Modification Unit, Director, Office Science & Technology Policy, Sloviter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
