Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Shawn Shaw v. USA
as 23-2586
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAWN D. SHAW
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re: Shawn ShawIn re: In Re: Shawn Shaw
as 23-2124
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN D. SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ESTHER SALAS
JENKINS et al v. DEVOE et al
as 2:2023cv00383
Plaintiff:
KAREN ELIZABETH JENKINS and JASON SCOTT PETTY
Defendant:
TYLER DEVOE, WEST CALN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT., OFFICER JAMES D. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn D. ShawIn re: Shawn D. Shaw
as 22-1819
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN D. SHAW
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ESTHER SALAS
S. v. ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv08512
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY, NEW JERSEY, Essex County Corrections Officer Shawn D. Shaw, ESSEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
E. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv10714
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, COSMETIC TOILETRY AND FRAGRANCE ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff:
SUSITHEA D. SHAW
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LabMD, INC. V THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE ET AL
as 2:2020cv00766
Defendant:
ROBERT J. BOBACK, THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE, REED SMITH LLP and others
Plaintiff:
LABMD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv16702
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
SHAWN D. SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
LABMD, INC. et al v. TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv01365
Plaintiff:
LABMD, INC. and MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY
Defendant:
TIVERSA HOLDING CORP. , ROBERT J. BOBACK, REED SMITH LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Shawn Shaw
as 16-2860
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHAWN D. SHAW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
