Cases 1 - 10 of 687
PERRI v. WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06767
Petitioner:
BRIAN A. PERRI
Respondent:
WARDEN OF F.C.I. FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vernon Robinson v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
VERNON ROBINSON
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LYCOMING COUNTY
Vincent Pisciotta v. Warden Fort Dix FCI
as 24-1986
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PISCIOTTA
Defendant:
WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06498
Petitioner:
SATURNINO DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
OLUWADAMILARE v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06201
Petitioner:
ADELKE B. OLUWADAMILARE
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ-LEYVA v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 1:2024cv06118
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ-LEYVA
Respondent:
WARDEN FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ LEVYA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06028
Petitioner:
GERARDO ANTONIO SANCHEZ LEVYA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Forte v. City of Hazleton et al
as 3:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Neal Forte
Defendant:
City of Hazleton and Brett Green Naprava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CABRERA ARTEAGA v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
SANTOS EDELMIR CABRERA ARTEAGA
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
F.N.B. CORPORATION v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT SMITH
as 2:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
F.N.B. CORPORATION
Defendant:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
