Cases 1 - 9 of 9
REYNOLDS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv02693
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
GARY REYNOLDS
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kareem Millhouse v. Davis, et al
as 18-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant:
MS. DAVIS, P.A., FAUSTO, P.A.T., GARY REYNOLDS, M.D. and others
Debtor:
DR. SPALDING
Kareem Millhouse v. Davis, et al
as 11-3469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIS, Captain, FAUSTO, GARY REYNOLDS, M.D. and others
Gary Reynolds v. Fed Bureau of Prison
as 10-4250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY REYNOLDS
Defendant - Appellee:
FED BUREAU OF PRISONS
Kevin O. Rice v. Gary Reynolds, et al
as 09-1854
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN O. RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY REYNOLDS, DR., M.D., ET AL, P.A. ZORILLA, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT, P.A. MARTINEZ, PHYSICIANS ASSISTANT and others
Kevin O. Rice v. Gary Reynolds, et al
as 09-1978
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN O. RICE
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY REYNOLDS, M.D., Physician, P.A. ZORILLA, Physicians Assistant, P.A. MARTINEZ, Physicians Assistant and others
Kareem Millhouse v. Davi
as 08-1352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVIS, Officer, Physician Assistant MS
Defendant:
FASTO, Physician Assistant MR, GARY REYNOLDS, TROY LEVI and others
MILHOUSE v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2007cv02222
Plaintiff:
KAREEM HASSAN MILHOUSE
Defendant:
DAVIS, FASTO, GARY REYNOLDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOM et al v. HOGAN et al
as 2:2003cv20587
Defendant:
JIM C. BARRETT, SHERIFF GLEN WARREN, SARA B. SCHRADER and others
Plaintiff:
GLADYS MEDRANO, ROBIN HOSEY, DONNA HORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
