Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
CARLTON v. REY et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
TAMIKA CARLTON
Defendant:
ASHLEY REY and DOMINIC HOUGHTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Yarelis Rivera v. Ronald Edwards, et al
as 23-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YARELIS RIVERA
Defendant / Appellee:
DIRECTOR RONALD P. EDWARDS, C.O. HOUGHTON, SERGEANT PRIEDE and others
Zachary Spada v. Richard Houghton, et al
as 22-2816
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACHARY SPADA
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN RICHARD HOUGHTON, CO SEAN BOLT and CO ALBERT WOOD
Morin v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company et al
as 1:2022cv00356
Plaintiff:
Edward Morin
Defendant:
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company, John J. Lynch, Jr., Lawrence K. Fish and others
WHITFIELD v. HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY et al
as 2:2022cv00916
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT COMPANY, JOHN J LYNCH, JR., LAWRENCE K FISH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01598
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv03131
Defendant:
UNIDENTIFIED PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY OFFICERS, HUDSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CBP OFFICER FINE, in her official and individual capacity and others
Plaintiff:
YARELIS RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPADA v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2020cv00223
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT RICCI, FRANK QUINN, CAPTAIN FUNKHOUSER and others
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY SPADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RICHARDS v. HOUGHTON et al
as 1:2020cv00081
Defendant:
LT. ROGER HERMANN, LT. MICHAEL BOGANICS, KEVIN SUTTER and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
