Cases 1 - 10 of 38,384
DAVIS-EL v. KELLY et al
as 2:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
CHRIS KELLY, BRIAN KAMAUF, KAREN SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIMBERLAKE v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
ANTUAN TIMBERLAKE
Defendant:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, DAVID J. CLOSE, JAMES JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
RODRIGUEZ et al v. LONERGAN et al
as 3:2024cv06280
Plaintiff:
ROGER RODRIGUEZ and JANET RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
KEVIN J. LONERGAN, FLUIDICS, INC., EMCOR GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
STEVENS v. THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT. et al
as 3:2024cv06290
Plaintiff:
CALVIN T. STEVENS
Defendant:
THE NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPT., CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, MAURICE FINNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
POWERS v. OMALLEY
as 2:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY F. POWERS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jamiel Lawrence Williams
Defendant:
United States, State of Pennsylvania, Dr. Laurel R. Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gillette v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Robin L.M. Gillette
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
