Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Almeida v. Skilonger et al
as 3:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
Jarret A. Almeida
Defendant:
Thomas Skilonger and John J. Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Nona Greeley, Jennifer Adams, Michaella Adkins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
FENNELL et al v. KOSTURA et al
as 5:2019cv00669
Defendant:
DAVID COLLINS, JAMES C. KOSTURA, LIEUTENANT CRUZ and others
Plaintiff:
NIGEL DOUGLAS, SCOTT BROCKEL, DEKOTA BAPTISTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
JARRET v. DAIICHI SANKYO,INC. et al
as 1:2015cv06509
Plaintiff:
SUSAN JARRET
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO,INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jarret Fate v. Nathan Harper, et al
as 13-2219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARRET FATE
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHAN HARPER, Commander, Former Pittsburgh Police Chief, FORMER CMDR GEORGE T. TROSKY and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Dawn Ball v. Famiglio, et al
as 12-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAWN MARIE BALL
Defendant - Appellee:
FAMIGLIO, DR., GLORIA DIGGAN, R.N., EGAN and others
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
DILLELA, Nurse, VANESSA NICOLA, Hygenist, NELMS, Dentist and others
FATE v. HARPER et al
as 2:2012cv00459
Plaintiff:
JARRET FATE
Defendant:
NATHAN HARPER, GEORGE TROSKY and THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEE et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2009cv04945
Plaintiff:
WADE D. LEE and TANEIDA P. LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LORD et al v. GLOBAL VANTEDGE
as 2:2008cv03788
Plaintiff:
JARRET LORD and PATRICIA LORD
Defendant:
GLOBAL VANTEDGE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
