Cases 1 - 10 of 18
FITZGERALD v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2024cv01859
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN OF NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv14891
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
John Oberuch, Jr. v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 20-2860
Defendant / Appellee:
TWIN OAKS COMMUNITY SERVICES, GEORGE FEEHAN, JR., EDDY COUNTY NM POLICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN OBERUCH, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03811
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC v. FITZGERALD
as 1:2017cv12866
Plaintiff:
MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
Defendant:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRACKEN et al v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BRACKEN , WILLIAM DEFORTE , WILLIAM JACKSON and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MULLEN, CHELSA WAGNER, JOHN FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FITZGERALD v. D'ILIO et al
as 2:2014cv04025
Petitioner:
JOHN FITZGERALD
Respondent:
STEPHEN D'ILIO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00967
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JORDAN et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
LEE ROY JORDAN , RANDY WHITE , RAYFIELD WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
