Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Richardson v. Flory et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Richardson
Defendant:
Nurse Flory, Nurse Mallery, Nurse Leann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Prime Care Employees
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
John J Richardson
Defendant:
Prime Care Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Warden of Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2022cv01616
Petitioner:
John Joseph Richardson
Respondent:
Warden of Dauphin County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giuseppe Giudice v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1869
Petitioner:
GIUSEPPE GIUDICE, a/k/a Joe Giudice
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Yet Classified:
STEVEN ABRAMS, PAUL W. SCHMIDT, LORY D. ROSENBERG, Esq. and others
BARTHAKUR v. OLSZYK et al
as 3:2016cv01995
Plaintiff:
ABHI BARTHAKUR
Defendant:
HANK OLSZYK, JOHN F. RICHARDSON, FRANK BLANDINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CABBELL v. SERGEANT SINGER et al
as 2:2015cv07947
Plaintiff:
APRIL-RENEA CABBELL
Defendant:
SERGEANT SINGER, JOHN P. RICHARDSON and JODIE HASAN RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CABBELL v. RICHARDSON
as 3:2015cv05468
Plaintiff:
APRIL CABBELL
Defendant:
JOHN F. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
CABBELL v. HANSEN-RODRIQUEZ et al
as 2:2015cv03260
Petitioner:
APRIL RENEA CABBELL
Respondent:
JODI HANSEN-RODRIQUEZ, JOHN F RICHARDSON and STEINHEUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ABDELGAWAD v. MANGIERI et al
as 2:2014cv01641
Plaintiff:
BAHER ABDELGAWAD
Defendant:
MARK MANGIERI and EXCLUSIVE SUPPLEMENTS, INC.
Cross_claimant:
JOHN J. RICHARDSON
Cross_defendant:
BAHER ABDELGAWAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Richardson v. Michelle Ricci, et al
as 13-3696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN S. RICHARDSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE RICCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
