Cases 1 - 10 of 28
EVANS v. THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2023cv05121
Plaintiff:
CHERYL EVANS
Defendant:
THE GENSIGHT GROUP INC. doing business as GENSIGHT and MICHAEL MENARD
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Phoenix Contact USA, Inc. v. Menard Electronics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00258
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Contact USA, Inc.
Defendant:
Menard Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
USA v. Guy Charles
as 22-3297
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GUY MENARD CHARLES, a/k/a Guy Menard
MENARD v. ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
as 2:2022cv03056
Plaintiff:
MARK MENARD
Defendant:
ASTELLAS PHARMA US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano, Linda Meiborg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MENARD v. MANSI et al
as 2:2021cv02130
Plaintiff:
CHARLES GUY MENARD
Defendant:
PATRICIA CURRANT, CAROLINE CINQUANTO, CORIE FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
MENARD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2020cv13710
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
BRENDA MENARD and THE ESTATE OF TERESA MENARD
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
