Cases 1 - 10 of 1,134
Stone v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Marc Stone
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
VOREL v. SALKOVITZ et al
as 2:2024cv05933
Plaintiff:
AINSLIE H. VOREL
Defendant:
MARC SALKOVITZ and PAMELA SALKOVITZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
REICHBART v. FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
MARC REICHBART
Defendant:
FINANCIAL BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SOLUTIONS, INC.
Brian Taylor v. CDS Advantage Solutions, et al
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
BRIAN L. TAYLOR
Defendant:
CDS ADVANTAGE SOLUTIONS and MARC SULLIVAN
Tim Burton v. Marc Ziegler
as 24-1803
Plaintiff:
TIM BURTON
Defendant:
MARC ZIEGLER, in his individual capacity as a Trooper for the Pennsylvania State Police
SIRIANI v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SIRIANI
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIRE, U.C.H.C. UNIVERSITY CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blecher v. Koninkelijke Philips N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Marc Blecher
Defendant:
KONINKELIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS HOLDING USA INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ACOSTA et al v. COSTA et al
as 2:2024cv01116
Defendant:
L & G CONSTRUCTION CORP., PATRICIA COSTA, MARCELO LIMA and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN ACOSTA and MARC RIOS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
VINCENT v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
MARC VINCENT
Respondent:
Superintendent, JOSEPH TERRA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
