Cases 1 - 10 of 2,073
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIDDINGS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2024cv00674
Plaintiff:
LEVI GIDDINGS
Defendant:
M. J. ZAKEN, S. BUZAS, MR. COULEHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Nicholas et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Cooper
Defendant:
Warden Nicholas, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Mrs. Lampert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff:
EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant:
MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUSHING v. GREENTREE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LP et al
as 1:2024cv05742
Plaintiff:
DAVID CUSHING
Defendant:
GREENTREE MORTGAGE COMPANY, LP, FREEDOM MORTGAGE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE CORP. doing business as MR. COOPER and others
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC v. ARCHNOI et al
as 2:2024cv01765
Plaintiff:
MR. SANDLESS FRANCHISE, LLC
Defendant:
SURADEJ ARCHNOI and 3P&C GLOBAL CORP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
MCCANN v. PRIME CARE et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
LONNIE MCCANN
Defendant:
PRIME CARE, CHRISTIAN SMITH, MR. DECALVISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Joel Muir v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-1754
Plaintiff:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MR. J. HALL, MR. J. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
COLLIER v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv01614
Plaintiff:
MR. ANTHONY DENNIS COLLIER
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
