Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fredil Rodriguez Fuentes v. District Attorney Northumberland County, et al
as 22-2603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDIL OMAR RODRIGUEZ FUENTES
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Lester Rodriguez-Boror v. Attorney General United States
as 22-1069
Petitioner:
LESTER OMAR RODRIGUEZ-BOROR
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01335
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rodriguez Fuentes v. Overlander
as 3:2019cv01516
Petitioner:
Fredil Omar Rodriguez Fuentes
Respondent:
Overlander and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MIRABAL et al v. CARIBBEAN CAR WASH, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv16608
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICARDO ANTUNEZ VALDEZ, GABRIEL CANO ARANGO, RIGOBERTO ANDUX MIRABAL and others
Defendant:
ULPIANO RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, OMAR RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Fuentes v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
as 3:2019cv01338
Petitioner:
Omar Rodriguez Fuentes and Fredil Omar Rodriguez-Fuentes
Respondent:
PA State Attorney General and Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FUENTES v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03736
Plaintiff:
OMAR RODRIGUEZ FUENTES
Defendant:
SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RODRIGUEZ v. CLAFLIN
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
OMAR RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
CLAFLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Omar Rodriguez v. Superintendent Chester SCI
as 16-3101
Petitioner:
OMAR RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT CHESTER SCI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
