Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Ryan Dean v. J. Bissell, et al
as 23-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RYAN DEAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. BISSELL, IMMIGRATION CONSULTANTS OF CANADA REGULATORY COUNCIL, ATKINS and others
Defendant:
ABC CORP 1-100, BALBIRAN, P. C. and others
GOODE v. ZALESKI et al
as 2:2023cv02506
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
THOMAS M. ZALESKI, WILLIAM J. KNECHT, SHIVA RAJA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. WERNER et al
as 2:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
RONALD GOODE
Defendant:
BRIAN WERNER, THOMAS ROLA, JR, P/O NELL J CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOODE v. A-CRUZ et al
as 2:2023cv02104
Petitioner:
RONALD GOODE
Respondent:
A-CRUZ, THOMAS M. ZALESKI, BRIAN WERNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
WALSH v. OM SHIVA ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00683
Plaintiff:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
OM SHIVA ENTERPRISE, INC. doing business as CRANBERRY SUNOCO doing business as ECONOMY SUNOCO and DURLABHJU UKANI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
STEIN v. SCHLOTTERBECK et al
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
SHIVA STEIN
Defendant:
STEVEN T. SCHLOTTERBECK, ROBERT J. MCNALLY, DAVID L. PORGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH v. OM SHIVA ENTERPRISE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01578
Plaintiff:
MARTIN J. WALSH
Defendant:
OM SHIVA ENTERPRISE, INC. doing business as MONACA SUNOCO, DURLABHJU UKANI and BHARTIBEN UKANI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stein v. IEC Electronics Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
IEC Electronics Corp., Keith M. Butler, Charles P. Hadeed and others
DEAN v. J. BISSELL et al
as 2:2021cv09770
Defendant:
BELL JR., TOWNSHIP OF CEDAR GROVE, JOZSA and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN DEAN
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Stein v. Welbilt, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00812
Defendant:
Cynthia M. Egnotovich, William C. Johnson, Brian R. Gamache and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
