Cases 1 - 10 of 57
SCHILLING v. MACDONALD et al
as 2:2024cv06680
Plaintiff:
MIKE SCHILLING
Defendant:
GUY MACDONALD, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C. GILMAN and others
SCOTT et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv00315
Plaintiff:
EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and CHRISTOPHER JAMES ROBERTS
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, LAUREL R. HARRY, JAMES C. BARNACLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHILLING v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2023cv23262
Plaintiff:
DIANE SCHILLING
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Angela Reading v. North Hanover Township New Jersey, et al
as 23-3092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANGELA READING
Defendant / Appellee:
TOWNSHIP OF NORTH HANOVER, ROBERT DUFF, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for North Hanover Township, HELEN PAYNE, in her individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1834
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
READING v. NORTH HANOVER TOWNSHIP, NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
ANGELA READING
Defendant:
NORTH HANOVER TOWNSHIP, ROBERT DUFF, HELEN PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SHAPIRO v. BARBER et al
as 3:2022cv05396
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHAPIRO
Defendant:
DONNA BARBER, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS and DAWN SCHILLING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
GONZALEZ v. SCHILLING et al
as 3:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
VICTOR GONZALES and VICTOR GONZALEZ
Defendant:
SCHILLING, VICKLUND, HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
