Cases 1 - 10 of 599
SHAW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv10498
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN DOES I-V
Plaintiff:
MARY SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
ARMOUR et al v. LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2024cv10387
Plaintiff:
LAURIE GILMER, GINGER COWAN, NOAH GORDON and others
Defendant:
LG ELECTRONICS U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
LINTON v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 2:2024cv09702
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL and PATRICIA SHAW
Plaintiff:
ROCMOINE LINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vamsidhar Vurimindi v. Fuqua School of Business, et al
as 24-2869
Defendant:
EMERGENT GAME TECHNOLOGIES, TALECRIS BIOTHERAPEUTICS INC, SIGNALSCAPE INC and others
Plaintiff:
VAMSIDHAR REDDY VURIMINDI
MCCLAIN v. RUIZ, III et al
as 2:2024cv04704
Defendant:
SGT. BLAIR, KELSEY MILLETS, NURSE SHANNON and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH W. MCCLAIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHAW v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2024cv04457
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MELINDA SHAW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TAYLOR v. NUNEZ et al
as 2:2024cv01188
Defendant:
LARRY SHAW, MARK BROTHERS, LESLIE BRADLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DANE D. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
JOE GIGLIOTTI, R. BRAINIFF, ROSS and others
Plaintiff:
MS. JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DOE v. ODDO et al
as 3:2024cv00144
Defendant:
R. BOLLINGER, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, R.A. SETH JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SAMPLE, KELLY J. ROBERTSON, DEREK ARTIM and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
