Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Turner et al v. Lam Research Corporation
as 1:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Gary T. Turner and Ana Maria Turner
Defendant:
Lam Research Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Cheng v. Total System Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01513
Defendant:
Connie D. McDaniel, Sidney E. Harris, Thaddeus Arroyo and others
Plaintiff:
Shao Cheng Cheng
MADISON v. CLARK et al
as 1:2019cv00183
Defendant:
T. TURNER, DONNA VARNER, SUPT. MICHAEL CLARK and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE MADISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv13679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HURT et al v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 2:2012cv05932
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT and WILLIAM T. TURNER
Defendant:
U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brian Grant, et al v. Darryl Turner, et al
as 11-2760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN GRANT, CHENEL GRANT, MARTIN PRIBUSH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DARRYL T. TURNER, Individually and d/b/a Dream Vacations International, Inc., ALLEN BERNSTEIN, JACKIE BORK and others
TURNER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv85711
Plaintiff:
DOYLE T. TURNER, DOYLE T. TURNER and DOYLE T. TURNER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., RAILROAD FRICTION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TURNER v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61097
Plaintiff:
WILL T. TURNER, JR., WILL T. TURNER, JR., WILL T. TURNER, JR. and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TURNER v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61223
Plaintiff:
WILL T. TURNER, SR., WILL T. TURNER, SR., WILL T. TURNER, SR. and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
