Cases 1 - 10 of 32
BROWN v. ARMEL et al
as 2:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR BROWN
Defendant:
ERIC ARMEL, LIEUTENANT A TYNER, SGT. THOMAS BURRIE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
DAUGHTRY v. CEKADA et al
as 2:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
MARTIQUE DAUGHTRY
Defendant:
CO CEKADA, CO RANKIN, CO HERKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HALL v. SCI FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv01023
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HALL
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, B. RUDZIENSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00904
Plaintiff:
SHAKOUR A. BROWN
Defendant:
CAPTAIN WALKER, CHAPLAIN LEWIS, C.O. 1 COSTELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PALUCH et al v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2022cv00720
Defendant:
SGT. TYNER, GEORGE LITTLE, ERIC T. ARMEL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. PALUCH, JR. and WILLIE M. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LAFFEY v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00296
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS LAFFEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MARK CAPOZZA, CO I EMMINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDOWELL v. TYNER
as 1:2021cv15562
Plaintiff:
RANDY MCDOWELL
Defendant:
DAMON G. TYNER and COUNTY OF ATLANTIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WELDON et al v. TYNER et al
as 1:2021cv04392
Plaintiff:
TROY SESSOMS, CARLA WELDON, D. F. J. and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL KELLY, JOHN.JANE DOE(S) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF THE ATLANTIC COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE 1-50, JOHN/JANE DOE(S) LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS FROM OTHER LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
ROMAN v. TYNER
as 1:2020cv20344
Plaintiff:
HENRY ROMAN
Defendant:
DAMON G. TYNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. TYNER
as 1:2020cv17426
Defendant:
DAMON G. TYNER
Plaintiff:
MARK JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
