Cases 1 - 10 of 19
CANTWELL v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01325
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CANTWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GORCHOCK v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01329
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC., ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GORCHOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BACHNER v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01324
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM FIELD SERVICES, LLC, ABC CORPORATIONS (1-10) and others
Plaintiff:
KERRI ANN BACHNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GORCHOCK v. AECOM C&E, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01323
Defendant:
AECOM CONSULT, INC., AECOM FIELD SERVICES, LLC, AECOM INFRASTRUCTURE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ALISA M. GORCHOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIXON MILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC v. RGD HOLDING COMPANY, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv11927
Defendant:
GREG BERGER, RMPC DIXON, LLC, PROSPECT CAPITAL GROUP, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DIXON MILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION INC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SUMTER v. URS CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv04311
Plaintiff:
REGINALD SUMTER
Defendant:
URS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SUMTER v. URS CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv02183
Plaintiff:
REGINALD SUMTER
Defendant:
URS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60181
Plaintiff:
LANNY SANDERS and SANDRA JENSEN SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP, INC, ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
