Cases 1 - 10 of 12
PITTMAN et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv09190
Plaintiff:
PAMELA JEAN PITTMAN and WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 16-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, DAVID IRIZARRY, LIEUTENANT and others
PITTMAN v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2014cv01568
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT, EVELYN CRUZ CAROFILIS, KATHIE DEFURIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2012cv03297
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PITTMAN v. METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2012cv02044
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BROUGH OF METUCHEN, DAVID IRIZARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTMAN v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2011cv06604
Petitioner:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Respondent:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 10-4246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, VINCENT RUSSO and others
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 09-4253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, ROBIN RENTENBERG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
