Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHENCK-FAISON v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2023cv22437
Plaintiff:
J'QUAN SCHENCK-FAISON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, OFFICER T.M. BROWN, SGT. ABRAHAM JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PARKER v. TICE, et al
as 2:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PARKER
Defendant:
E. TICE, M. HOUSER, M. PYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
UNLIMITED PINS LLC v. SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP et al
as 2:2023cv03338
Plaintiff:
UNLIMITED PINS LLC
Defendant:
SCHENCK, PRICE, SMITH & KING, LLP and MICHAEL J. MAROTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
CARPENTER v. SCHENCK
as 3:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
HUNTER BRYCE SCHENCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RUBIN v. TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUBIN
Defendant:
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC., DAVID L BONVENUTO, JAMES J DOLAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
