Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,932
Tony Haile v. Administrator South Woods State Prison, et al
as 24-2088
Plaintiff: TONY HAILE
Defendant: ADMINISTRATOR SOUTH WOODS STATE PRISON and ATTORNEY GENERAL NEW JERSEY
CONNER v. SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv06509
Plaintiff: TERRENCE B. CONNER
Defendant: SOUTH WOODS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toni Wood v. Hertz Corp
as 24-8017
Petitioner: TONI R. WOOD
Respondent: HERTZ CORP
WOODS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv06370
Plaintiff: SHIRLA WOODS
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
WOOD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv06340
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and others
Plaintiff: DEBORAH WOOD and RICHARD FROST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff: HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant: BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner: CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01687
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?