Cases 31 - 40 of 478
Jordan Mitchell v. John Stone
as 23-6196
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN NATHANIEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN STONE, District Attorney Official Capacity, MEDICAL STAFF, Official Capacity and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Ibrahim Oudeh v. Goshen Medical Center, Inc.
as 23-1207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IBRAHIM OUDEH and TERESA SLOAN-OUDEH
Defendant / Appellee:
GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
3Rd Party Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Eric Orr v. State of NC
as 23-6152
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC CHRISTOPHER ORR
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Clifton Batts v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6062
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLIFTON WILLIAM BATTS
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Offie Brown, Jr. v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 23-6048
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OFFIE CURTIS BROWN, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, JOE BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Kevin Smith v. United States Government
as 23-1044
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CABARRUS COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA and others
Somchai Noonsab v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6029
Petitioner / Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Emmanuel McGriff El v. Centralize Infraction Bureau
as 22-7384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMMANUEL LEE MCGRIFF EL
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTRALIZE INFRACTION BUREAU, NORTH CAROLINA SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Adisah Al-Hanif El v. Roy Cooper
as 22-7222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADISAH LACY AL-HANIF EL, a/k/a Fredrick Bennett
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY COOPER, EDDIE BUFFALOE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Tori Neal v. State of North Carolina
as 22-7192
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORI NEAL
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and ERIK A. HOOKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
