Cases 41 - 50 of 916
Israel Alvarado v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 23-1419
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISRAEL ALVARADO, STEVEN BARFIELD, WALTER BROBST and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, U.S. Department of Defense, FRANK KENDALL, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Air Force, Department of the Air Force, CARLOS DEL TORO, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Navy, Department of the Navy and others
Robert Frazier v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 23-6359
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FRAZIER, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ANIBAL HERNANDEZ, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, D.P., a minor, by and through his next friend and guardian K.P. and others
Plaintiff:
DONNELL DAVIS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, LESLIE SHARP, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, ELMER LAGUAN-SALINAS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons and others
Defendant / Appellee:
PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND, CORENNE LABBE, in her official capacity as Director of the Prince George's County Department of Corrections, JEFFREY LOGAN, in his official capacity as Division Chief of the Prince George's County Population Management Division and others
Defendant:
LAKEECIA RENEE ALLEN, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, BRYON BEREANO, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County, JOHN BIELEC, in their personal capacities and official capacities as District and Circuit Court Judges for the District and Circuit Courts of Maryland for Prince George's County and others
James Rose, Jr. v. Randy Demory
as 23-6309
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD ROSE, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY DEMORY, Director Hill-Finklea Detention Center
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, HONORABLE D. L. JEFFERSON and SHERIFF DUANE LEWIS
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 23-1325
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Defendant / Appellee:
TALMAGE S. BAGGETT, Judge, ELLEN B. HANCOX, Trial Clerk Administrator, RONNIE MONROE MITCHELL, Attorney and others
Albert Anderson v. Doe 1
as 23-6266
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE 1, SERGEANT LEWIS and OFFICER DOLO
Steven Prentice v. Gregory Haynes
as 23-6243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN DIXON PRENTICE
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. GREGORY DELAND HAYNES, PHILLIP W. TOLMAN, DR. CLIFFORD CURTIS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, TERRI CATLETT and others
Wali Jahangiri v. Lewis-Gale Medical Center, LLC
as 22-2313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALI JAHANGIRI, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEWIS-GALE MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, d/b/a Lewis-Gale Medical Center
Robert Horowitz v. Mr. Rosales
as 22-2301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT HOROWITZ, CATHY HOROWITZ and ELIZABETH HOROWITZ
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ROSALES, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County
Defendant:
BRUCE SHERMAN, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County, YORGOS BALARAS, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County, ROBIN LEWIS, Deputy Sheriff of Montgomery County and others
Jeffrey Connaughton v. Gregory Milligan
as 22-2296
Claimant:
JEFFREY J. CONNAUGHTON, TONY DAVIS, ROCHELLE KATZ and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Intervenor Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KEVIN B. MERRILL, JAY B. LEDFORD, CAMERON R. JEZIERSKI and others
Intervenor:
MASSACHUSETTS' ATTORNEY GENERAL
Receiver:
GREGORY S. MILLIGAN and RANDEL LEWIS
Ray Hale v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
as 22-2291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY LEWIS HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
