Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 340
Bussie v. Sharf
as 5:2024ct03114
Plaintiff: Anthony Bussie
Defendant: Dr. Sharf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Begeny v. The Helps Education Fund, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Dr. John Begeny
Defendant: The Helps Education Fund, Inc., William Gibson and Erin Banks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff: Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant: Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff: Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant: Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manno v. McRae et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff: Dr. Francis A.M. Manno
Defendant: Dr. Susan McRae, Karen Oppelt, Members of the IACUC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Avens v. Dixon et al
as 4:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Cynthia B. Avens
Defendant: Faris C. Dixon, Jr., Vidant/ECU Health Medical Center, Dr. Karen Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Partin v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2023ct03339
Plaintiff: Courtney Garvin Partin
Defendant: Warden Scarantino, Dr. Cloutier, Dr. Sharf and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pacheco v. Owen et al
as 5:2023ct03329
Plaintiff: Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant: Dr. Owen, Dr. Snee, Dr. Bernabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cooper et al
as 5:2023ct03322
Plaintiff: Maurice Johnson
Defendant: Governor Roy Cooper, Todd E. Ishee, Stephen Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McLester v. DeGuehery et al
as 5:2023ct03263
Plaintiff: David McLester
Defendant: Dr. Lindsey DeGuehery and Nurse R. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?