Cases 31 - 40 of 260
Jones v. Buffaloe
as 3:2022cv00553
Petitioner:
Rodney Eugene Jones
Respondent:
Eddie Buffaloe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dade v. Jones
as 1:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Deeshun Dade
Defendant:
FNU Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paszek-Lowman v. Caldwell County et al
as 5:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
Administrator Madeline Loraine Paszek-Lowman and Madeline Loraine Paszek-Lowman
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Sheriff Alan C. Jones, Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dade v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Deeshun Dade
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Reyburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Movement Mortgage LLC et al v. Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC, Justin Wiesert, Isaac Alexander and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
Clervrain et al v. Tillis et al
as 1:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Manetiony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
Thom Tillis, Sydney Batch, Madison Cawthorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El v. Horowitz et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
My'Ka El
Defendant:
Michael E Horowitz, US Department of Justice, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Honeycutt et al
as 1:2021cv00348
Plaintiff:
Johnathan A. Fuller
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, James Waldroop, Landon Browning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00130
Plaintiff:
Roy Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.