Cases 11 - 20 of 23
John Smith v. Inder Gujral
as 19-6268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN KEITH SMITH
Defendant:
C. WEBB and WANDA ROLLINS
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR INDER JEET SINGH GUJRAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019md02879
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Special Master:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv07579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Young v. Rollins Rentals
as 3:2015cv00242
Plaintiff:
Derrick Young
Defendant:
Rollins Rentals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Young v. Rollins et al
as 3:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Derrick Young
Defendant:
Jerry Rollins, Virginia Rollins and Jimmie Pendergrass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Industrial Fumigant Co.
as 14-1701
Petitioner:
In re: INDUSTRIAL FUMIGANT CO. and ROLLINS, INC.
:
, and
Rollins v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2009cv01459
Plaintiff:
Vernon Rollins
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Hufford v. The United States EPA et al
as 1:2009cv02279
Plaintiff:
Dianne B. Hufford
Defendant:
The United States EPA, Corp. of Engineers (Cambridge/Balt), MD. Dept. of the Environment and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rollins v. Actavis Totowa, LLC
as 2:2009cv00928
Plaintiff:
Ora Rollins
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
John Grainger v. National Union Fire Insurance
as 08-1275
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN R. GRAINGER and LESLIE W. HAWORTH
Plaintiff:
ALAN GARNER, LAWRENCE BEITMAN, AMERICAN HIGH INCOME TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellant:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Defendant - None:
KENNETH W. WINGER, MICHAEL BRAGAGNOLO, PAUL R. HUMPHREY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
