Cases 31 - 40 of 5,080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Steven Samuel v. Tonya Little
as 24-6355
Plaintiff:
STEVEN LEWIS SAMUEL, a/k/a Steven Samuel
Defendant:
TONYA COPELAND LITTLE, Esq.
Chavis v. Stump et al
as 7:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jason Chavis
Defendant:
K-9 Officer Stump, J.A. Murray, Alfed Yates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Kevin Herriott v. Alan Wilson
as 24-6348
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HERRIOTT, a/k/a Kevin Edward Herriott
Defendant:
ALAN WILSON, BRYAN STIRLING, JOHN PALMER and others
James Barnett, Jr. v. Mr. Mouring
as 24-6343
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNETT, JR., a/k/a Lady Ja Barnett
Defendant:
MR. MOURING
Tucker v. VADOC et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Taiveon Tucker
Defendant:
VADOC, Dunlevy, Whitehurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, William K. Marshall, Didymus Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sorrell v. WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Michael Sorrell
Defendant:
WV Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Commissioner William K. Marshall, III, Dr. Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Budney v. Ronnie Huneycutt
as 24-6326
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BUDNEY, f/k/a Matthew R. Budney
Defendant:
RONNIE LANE HUNEYCUTT, Superintendent Warden at Avery Mitchell Correctional, BRIAN WATSON, Special Affairs Captain at Avery Mitchell Correctional Institution, RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer for the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
