Cases 81 - 90 of 134,694
Byers v. Hasenau et al
as 5:2024cv03333
Plaintiff:
Ramon D Byers
Defendant:
Jason Hasenau and William Sellars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
McClain v. Hewitt et al
as 0:2024cv03330
Plaintiff:
Johnny I. McClain, III
Defendant:
Sgt. Michael Hewitt, Chief Admin John Hicks, Operations Capt. Rodney Hope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Littles v. Days et al
as 1:2024cv03327
Plaintiff:
Dwight Alonso Littles, Jr.
Defendant:
Allyson Days, Waddell Coe and James Hudson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Thompson v. The State of South Carolina
as 1:2024cv03331
Plaintiff:
James Henry Thompson, II
Defendant:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French v. Circuit Court for Montgomery County et al
as 1:2024cv01610
Petitioner:
Crisstofer Michael French, Sr
Respondent:
Circuit Court for Montgomery County and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01486
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOWARD v. USA
as 1:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
DEVAUN DONTRE HOWARD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
BROOKS v. RICKER et al
as 1:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
RASHAWN A. BROOKS
Defendant:
OFFICER RICKER, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES-BEY v. PARSONS
as 1:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE L. JAMES-BEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL PARSONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CUMMINGS v. OFFICIALS AT MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENER
as 1:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
JAMES CUMMINGS
Defendant:
OFFICIALS AT MOORE COUNTY DETENTION CENER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
