Cases 21 - 28 of 28
SJK ABSOLUTE RETURN FUND, LLC et al v. EISNERAMPER LLP et al
as 1:2013cv00432
Plaintiff:
SJK ABSOLUTE RETURN FUND, LLC and SJK ABSOLUTE RETURN FUND, LTD.
Defendant:
EISNERAMPER LLP and EISNERAMPER (CAYMAN) LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Catlin Insurance Company (UK) Ltd. v. Port Distribution, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01340
Plaintiff:
Catlin Insurance Company (UK) Ltd.
Defendant:
Port Distribution, Inc. and Genokh Vulfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Dr. Stuart T. Zaller, LLC v. Pharmawest Pharmacy, Ltd, et al
as 1:2011cv00789
Plaintiff:
Dr. Stuart T. Zaller, LLC
Defendant:
Pharmawest Pharmacy, Ltd and John Doe Fax Broadcaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
All Risks, Ltd. v. Jimcor Agency, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
All Risks, Ltd.
Defendant:
Jimcor Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Millenium Marketing Group Ltd et al v. Ross
as 6:2008cv00932
Plaintiff:
Millenium Marketing Group Ltd, Millenium Marketing Group Ltd, Millenium Marketing Group Ltd and others
Defendant:
Samuel B. Ross, II
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company v. M/V MARLIN et al
as 2:2008cv00134
Plaintiff:
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company and Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company
Defendant:
M/V MARLIN, Marlin Shipping Limited and SMT Shipmanagement & Transport LTD.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WARSOWE ACQUISITION CORPORATION v. NOBLE et al
as 1:2007cv00743
Plaintiff:
WARSOWE ACQUISITION CORPORATION and WARSOWE ACQUISITION CORPORATION
Defendant:
L. STEVEN NOBLE and GREYLOCK ADVISORY GROUP, LTD.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
American Sugar Refining, Inc. v. M/V CHALKIDON, et al
as 1:2007cv01219
Plaintiff:
American Sugar Refining, Inc.
Defendant:
M/V CHALKIDON and Marmaras Navigation Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
