Cases 1 - 10 of 20,901
King v. Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Agnes V. King
Defendant:
Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corporation and Jason Heim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2024cv00541
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hernandez v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2024cv00542
Defendant:
Thomas Webb, City of Raleigh, Lloyd's, London and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Kareem Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Green v. Sipos et al
as 5:2024cv00188
Defendant:
Josh Sipos and Brenda L. Miller
Plaintiff:
Julian Lee Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yehuda v. Maryland Department of Health et al
as 8:2024cv02702
Plaintiff:
Yerayel Yehuda
Defendant:
Bryan Mroz, Leslie A. McMillan, Maryland Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Gahler
as 1:2024cv02712
Plaintiff:
Lateia S. Green
Defendant:
Sheriff Gahler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Stanley v. Stanley et al
as 2:2024cv05175
Defendant:
Tyler Whitton Stanley and State of South Carolina, et al
Plaintiff:
Julia Catherine Stanley, Nagipejutawin and Nagipe Jutawin Stanley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dollen v. Blackhurst et al
as 2:2024cv00515
Defendant:
Wendy Jones, Rocky Holmes, Lora Dyer and others
Plaintiff:
Beverly Jean Dollen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Gillis v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Gillis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deal v. City of Monroe
as 3:2024cv00845
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Deal
Defendant:
City of Monroe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
