Cases 11 - 20 of 34
GUNTER v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
DAVID RAY GUNTER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, INC. , JASON JUNKINS , DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Albert Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville
as 15-1299
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERT CLATTERBUCK and CHRISTOPHER MARTIN
Plaintiff:
EARL MCCRAW, JOHN JORDAN and MICHAEL SLOAN
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Dale v. Mayor and City Council Of Baltimore et al
as 1:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Jerome Dale
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore City, The Baltimore City Police Department, Anthony Batts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan Pleasants v. Town of Louisa
as 14-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SLOAN PLEASANTS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF LOUISA and ROBERT RIGSBY, sued in his individual capacity
Sloan v. Regan
as 1:2012cv01216
Plaintiff:
Jolene Sloan
Defendant:
Sean Regan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sloan Pleasants v. Town of Louisa
as 12-1496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SLOAN PLEASANTS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOWN OF LOUISA and ROBERT RIGSBY, sued in his individual capacity
Albert Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville
as 12-1215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ALBERT CLATTERBUCK, CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, EARL MCCRAW and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Albert Clatterbuck v. City of Charlottesville
as 12-1149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERT CLATTERBUCK, CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, EARL MCCRAW and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE
Sloan v. NC Division of Motor Vehicles et al
as 2:2011cv00052
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sloan
Defendant:
NC Division of Motor Vehicles , M. A. Duckett and Kathy Brannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Smith v. County of Picken
as 11-7391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY RAYBURN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF PICKENS, DAVID STONE, Pickens County Sheriff, DEWEY SMITH, Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
