Cases 31 - 40 of 41
James Lawrence Smith v. Honorable Ed Clontz
as 14-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LAWRENCE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
HONORABLE ED CLONTZ, JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE and others
Smith v. State of North Carolina, et al.
as 1:2014cv00269
Plaintiff:
James Lawrence Smith
Defendant:
Hon. Ed Clontz, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. et al v. Terry et al
as 3:2014cv00591
Plaintiff:
Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. and Tamira Thayne
Defendant:
Tracy Terry, Surry County, Surry County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey et al
as 3:2014cv00511
Plaintiff:
Akil R. Bey and Katina Bowers-Graves
Defendant:
Sharon Gregory Jacobs, Marilynn C. Goss, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 2 v. Burke County Board of Education
as 1:2013cv00300
Defendant:
Burke County Board of Education
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Owusu v. United States of America et al
as 8:2012cv02326
Plaintiff:
Alexander Owusu
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert S. Mueller, III, Jane Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Marshall v. Purcell et al
as 2:2012cv00084
Plaintiff:
Bradley R Marshall
Defendant:
Stephen L Purcell, Jennifer Gee, United States Department of Labor, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mantooth v. Mullins et al
as 7:2011cv02467
Plaintiff:
Robert Marcel Mantooth
Defendant:
Kathy Trent Mullins, Laura A Mantooth, Mitzi L Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day v. Milam et al
as 1:2011cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tori Lakisha Day
Defendant:
Russell B. Milam , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rutledge v. Hooters of America, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv00608
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Defendant:
Hooters of America, Inc., Hooters Restaurant, Shawn Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
