Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Pierce v. Singleton
as 8:2023cv05609
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Pierce
Defendant:
Danny Singleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Tornello Pierce El Bey v. State of Maryland
as 23-2102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TITLE OF CONSUL TORNELLO FONTAINE PIERCE EL BEY
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, (Inc), LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, a/k/a Larry Hogan, RICHARD DELNO FRITZ, Bar Membership # 7706010084 and others
Fite v. Brooks et al
as 1:2023cv00279
Plaintiff:
Raven Fite
Defendant:
Regina Brooks, Jamarcus Nance and Raymond Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pierce El-Bey v. State Of Maryland (inc) et al
as 8:2023cv01229
Defendant:
Lawrence J. Hogan, State Of Maryland (inc), Larry Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Title of Consul Tornello-Fontaine Pierce El-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 cv Civil Rights
Jarvis v. Piercing Pagoda
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
Derek N Jarvis
Defendant:
Zale Delaware, Inc. doing business as Piercing Pagoda and Piercing Pagoda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00175
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Sister E. Jones-Bey v. Chen et al
as 3:2021cv00256
Defendant:
Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, Pamela K. Chen, Attorney General Letitia James and others
Plaintiff:
Sister E. Jones-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nieves v. Pierce
as 2:2019cv00647
Plaintiff:
Shakirah Nieves
Defendant:
Jackie Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Whitlock et al
as 3:2019cv00606
Defendant:
Barbara Wooldridge, Primary Stalker, Earlean Greene and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Caloun-Smith Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price et al v. Pierce et al
as 5:2019cv00228
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Sergeant Shatana Latice Jones, Mark Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Chandler Price, Michael Price and I. P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
