Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Newkirk v. Wade, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00346
Plaintiff: Veronica Newkirk and Veronica D. Newkirk
Defendant: Christopher Wade, Trooper John Doe 1, Trooper John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parrish v. Cathey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00406
Defendant: Jane Doe 10, Jane Doe 3, Jane Doe 6 and others
Plaintiff: Dustin V. Parrish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
I.A.A.B. v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-2232
Plaintiff - Appellee: IRANIAN ALLIANCES ACROSS BORDERS, JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2 and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customes and Border Protection and others
Iranian Alliances Across Borders et al v. Trump et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2017cv02921
Plaintiff: Iranian Alliances Across Borders , Jane Doe #1 , Jane Doe #2 and others
Defendant: Donald J. Trump , Elaine C. Duke , Kevin K. McAleenan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams et al v. Deputy Sheriff John/Jane Doe #1 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv02381
Plaintiff: Tanya R Williams , DJ , TW and others
Defendant: Deputy Sheriff John/Jane Doe #1, Deputy Sheriff John/Jane Doe #2, Deputy Sheriff John/Jane Doe #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe-4 v. Horry County South Carolina et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv03136
Plaintiff: Doe-4 and Jane Doe-4
Defendant: Horry County South Carolina, Horry County Police Department, Saundra Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lisa Bain Landis v. Buncombe County
as 16-1462
Plaintiff - Appellant: LISA BAIN LANDIS, et al
Defendant - Appellee: BUNCOMBE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, WANDA GREENE, Manager, BUNCOMBE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Defendant: BUNCOMBE COUNTY CLERK OF THE BOARD
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1385
Plaintiff - Appellee: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellant: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Gwendolyn Smalls v. James Binner
as 16-1383
Plaintiff - Appellant: GWENDOLYN SMALLS, as Administratrix of the Estate of Linwood Raymond Lambert, Jr., deceased
Defendant - Appellee: CHIEF OF POLICE JAMES W. BINNER, Colonel, Individually and in his official capacity, DEPURTY CHIEF OF POLICE BRIAN K LOVELACE, Individually and in his official capacity, CITY OF SOUTH BOSTON, VIRGINIA and others
Defendant: JOHN DOE #1, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #2, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department, JOHN DOE #3, Individually and in their official capacities as members of the South Boston Police Department and others
Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. et al v. Terry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00591
Plaintiff: Dogs Deserve Better, Inc. and Tamira Thayne
Defendant: Tracy Terry, Surry County, Surry County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?