Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Ryu v. Daniel Whitten
as 16-1421
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HYUNKWEON RYU
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL N. WHITTEN
Defendant:
WANDA F. BRYANT and WARREN COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Ryu v. Bryant et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Michael H. Ryu
Defendant:
Wanda F. Bryant , Warren County, Virginia and Daniel N. Whitten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Julia Souter v. County of Warren
as 14-2034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIA E. SOUTER
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF WARREN, a Political Subdivision of Virginia, WARREN COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, BLAIR DAVID MITCHELL, Warren County Attorney and others
Defendant:
JOHN KULNIS, Warren County Zoning Administrator
Maria Harless v. Charles McCann
as 13-1353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIA PHOEBE HARLESS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES MCCANN, individually and as a County Commissioner of Lincoln County, West Virginia, THOMAS RAMEY, JR., individually and as a County Commissioner of Lincoln County, West Virginia, CHARLES VANCE, individually and as a County Commissioner of Lincoln County, West Virginia and others
Defendant:
ROCKY ADKINS and WEST VIRGINIA COUNTIES GROUP SELF INSURANCE RISK POOL
Charles Brumfield v. Charles McCann
as 13-1348
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BRUMFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES MCCANN, THOMAS RAMEY, JR., JUDY JOHNSON and others
Harless v. McCann et al
as 2:2012cv01480
Plaintiff:
Maria Phoebe Harless
Defendant:
Charles McCann, Thomas Ramey, Jr., Charles Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brumfield v. McCann et al
as 2:2012cv01481
Plaintiff:
Charles Brumfield
Defendant:
Charles McCann , Thomas Ramey, Jr., Judy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv03311
Plaintiff:
Frederick T McKnight and Frederick T McKnight
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Calvin Anthony, Laurie Bessinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.