Cases 91 - 100 of 1,642
De Vere v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00508
Petitioner:
David Edward De Vere
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Curtis v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Leslie Erin Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America and Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GARLAND v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv00287
Petitioner:
ALBERT KIRK GARLAND
Respondent:
UNITES STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morgan v. Warden, Western Virginia Regional Jail
as 7:2023cv00185
Petitioner:
Everett Dion Morgan
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal, Western Virginia Regional Jail, Warden Western Virginia Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tori Bumpers v. US
as 23-6288
Petitioner / Appellant:
TORI DEMARCO BUMPERS
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00081
Petitioner:
Alden Bernard Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Franklin v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Deandre Franklin
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
William DeCory v. US
as 23-6230
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM M. A. DECORY
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Arvizu-Hernandez v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Arvizu-Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden Ray and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDonald v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00056
Petitioner:
Richard McDonald
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
