General Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 131 - 140 of 36,649
Wilson v. South Carolina
as 4:2024cv02599
Petitioner: Raekwon D.A. Wilson
Respondent: South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jibri Cunningham v. H. Quay
as 24-6389
Petitioner: JIBRI CUNNINGHAM
Respondent: WARDEN H. QUAY
Michael Berry v. VDOC
as 24-6390
Petitioner: MICHAEL ALLEN BERRY
Respondent: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner: Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent: Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner: Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent: Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent: Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner: Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hernandez v. Stein et al
as 5:2024hc02086
Petitioner: Carlos Hernandez and Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El
Respondent: Joshua H. Stein, Jamie Bullard and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00079
Petitioner: Calvin James
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thomas v. Dotson
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner: Timothy James Thomas
Respondent: Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Levi Springer v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6381
Petitioner: LEVI GARY SPRINGER
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON, Director of VA DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?